Category Archive: Question – Answer

Subcategories: No categories

Acceptable am glucose level in diabetes

Question: I am 70 years old with type II diabetes. What is an acceptable am glucose level? Is 130mg/dl acceptable?

Answer: Optimal normalization of glucose levels in diabetes patients has been shown to lower the long term risks of diabetic complications (such as diabetic eye, kidney, blood vessel and nerve diseases). Normal fasting morning blood glucose level is 70-120 mg/dl. Therefore, am fasting blood glucose level of 130mg/dl is acceptable. However, having satisfactory am blood glucose level is not enough. Ideally, blood glucose levels before lunch, before dinner, and at bedtime should also be well controlled. Oftentimes, doctor will order a blood test for HgA1C test. Normal HgA1C level indicates good glucose control, while abnormally high level indicates inadequate glucose control.

The risk of medication treatment of high blood glucose is overshooting, causing hypoglycemia (low blood glucose). Symptoms of hypoglycemia include sweating, palpitations, tremor, and weakness. Severe, prolonged hypoglycemia is dangerous and can lead to syncope and other problems. In patients who do not experience early warning symptoms of hypoglycemia, and in patients with coronary heart disease or who have seizures with hypoglycemia, doctors will settle for less ideal control of blood glucose to avoid problems of hypoglycemia.

Walking Away From Diabetes

The National Institutes of Health announced study results showing that diet and exercise can lower the risk of diabetes by 58 percent for 10 million Americans on the cusp of developing this common but deadly illness. The results were so impressive that federal officials halted the study a year early. We know you have questions about what this means for you and your family. Some answers follow.

Oh, boy, more people telling me to lose weight and get up off the couch. What’s the big deal this time?

This study is one of the best demonstrations that a few simple changes in lifestyle can have a powerful impact on preventing disease in high-risk people. In this research, people on the brink of developing diabetes followed a lower-fat diet, walked or did some other form of moderate exercise about 30 minutes a day five days a week and lost around 10 to 15 pounds. These changes reduced their chances of getting type 2 diabetes by almost 60 percent. Even better, this program worked in men and women, in young adults and seniors, and in all races. And the lifestyle changes were nearly twice as effective as the expensive medication to which it was compared.

Hey, wait, I know statistics can exaggerate the importance of a study. What were the chances of these people getting diabetes without any treatment? What were their chances if they made the changes?

Wow, you’re good. Each year, 10 percent of the people in this study who got no treatment developed diabetes. Do the math over a period of years and you can see this group is at very high risk indeed. About 5 percent of those who followed the moderate diet and exercise program developed the disease each year. That’s an impressive drop in risk — but it’s not a perfect record. The lifestyle program does not appear to prevent the disease in everybody who is at risk, but it improves their odds significantly.

Why are we so worried about diabetes all of a sudden? I thought heart disease and high blood pressure were the real killers.

Type 2 diabetes has reached epidemic proportions, and the number of people at risk for developing it increases every year. Some 16 million people have the disease and an estimated 800,000 Americans will be diagnosed this year. Type 2 diabetes is a chronic degenerative disease characterized by elevated blood sugar levels; it’s the leading cause of kidney disease, limb amputations and acquired blindness in adults. It also increases the risk of heart disease and stroke. (Many deaths blamed on heart attack and stroke are associated with diabetes.) Rates of type 2 diabetes have tripled in the last 30 years because of the rise in obesity and sedentary living. Worse, type 2 diabetes is being diagnosed in people at increasingly younger ages — even in kids. So diabetes is one of the most pervasive and deadly results of the American lifestyle.

How do I know if I’m enough like the people in this study to benefit from the lifestyle changes?

Most people in this study were overweight and sedentary adults. To be eligible, they also had to have “impaired glucose tolerance” — a pre-diabetic condition in which the body fails to process glucose efficiently, elevating blood sugar levels. (Over time, high blood sugar damages organs and blood vessels throughout the body, leading to kidney failure, blindness, amputations and heart disease.) An estimated 10 million Americans have this pre-diabetic condition, and most have lifestyles that put them at risk for developing it. Strictly speaking, the benefits demonstrated in the study apply only to those who already have impaired glucose intolerance — but researchers believe that similar interventions can reduce risk for others.

How do I know if I’m “overweight”?

If your friends won’t tell you, we will. You can start with body mass index — a figure that considers height and weight. If you have a BMI of 30 or above — technically the cutoff for “obesity” — you’re in the diabetes danger zone. At 5 feet 10 inches tall, that’s 209 pounds; at 5-4, it’s 174 pounds. (To compute your BMI on the Web, go to www.nhlbisupport.com/bmi/ You’ll also find a link there to a BMI chart.)

A BMI above 25 (128 for a five-footer, 164 for someone 5-8, 184 for a six-footer) is considered “overweight” and is also associated with an increased risk for impaired glucose tolerance.

Every time you guys write about the body mass index, people write in and say it’s inaccurate, deeming even those who have muscular physiques “fat.”

If you have a muscular physique and low body fat like the professional athletes cited by those letter writers, chances are you’re not at risk for diabetes. We’ll be politic and say that if your BMI is 30 or over, chances are pretty good that you are at increased risk. If you prefer, measure your body fat instead — but it’s hard to do accurately without professional help. Healthy ranges vary by age and sex, but if you’re a woman with a body fat number above 35 percent or a man whose number is over 24 percent, you should be worried. (Log on to www.shapeup.org/bodylab/ frmst.htm for more information on body fat.)

Are there other things aside from body mass or body fat that put me in a high-risk group?

Having a family member with diabetes adds to your risk. African Americans, Hispanics and Native Americans also face much higher risk of diabetes. So do women who developed gestational diabetes while pregnant, about half of whom develop full-blown diabetes later in life. People in these groups may want to consider preventive lifestyle changes even if their BMIs are not near 30.

How can I find out if my glucose tolerance is impaired?

Ask your doctor for a fasting glucose tolerance blood test. You’ll have to go without food for 10 hours before the test. At the doctor’s office, you drink a sugary liquid and then have your blood drawn at regular intervals over the next two hours to see how your body metabolizes the sugar.

Sounds like fun. How much is this going to cost me?

It’s a bargain: about $15 to $35. It’s often covered by health insurance. It’s also the only way to definitively tell whether you are moving toward diabetes — or perhaps already have it.

What happens if I have an abnormal result?

Depends on how abnormal. If your fasting blood sugar — that’s the first sample they take — is between 95 and 125 milligrams, you have impaired glucose tolerance and are a candidate for treatment. The same goes for a two-hour blood sugar level — that’s the last one drawn in the test — of 140 to 199 milligrams. Treatment could be lifestyle changes or a prescription for metformin (Glucophage), a drug that is approved to treat diabetes.

If your fasting blood sugar is 126 milligrams or above, or if your two-hour blood sugar level is 200 milligrams or above — sorry, but you already have diabetes. You’ll need to consult your doctor for immediate treatment.

So what were these lifestyle changes, anyway?

Participants ate between 1,200 and 1,800 calories per day, with about 25 percent of total calories coming from fat — not a huge reduction below the 30 percent-from-fat maximum recommended by many health authorities, and not as strict as many low-fat weight loss diets. They also learned how to exercise daily. Most walked for 30 minutes a day at least five times a week. Those unable to walk because of arthritis — or disinclined to do so — did other activities including swimming, tennis and jogging that equaled the number of calories burned by walking.

I’ve tried these diets and programs a thousand times, but I always fail. How did the study manage to keep people with the program?

Participants got a lot of hand-holding and group support. While this aspect of the study has gotten little attention, it’s very important. Many people need help to sustain lifestyle changes.

The people in this study received intensive, one-on-one weekly diet counseling for nearly six months. They got personal coaching for workouts and attended small groups that taught low-fat cooking and emphasized healthful grocery shopping. They kept daily records of their diet and exercise.

You could duplicate the program a number of ways, some of them free, some costly. You can take a low-fat cooking class, join a walking group or gym, form a network of support, check out local hospitals or your insurance group for support services or hire a personal trainer or dietitian.

When lifestyle changes fail, it’s often because the pressures that trigger the condition in the first place — the constant rushing that leads to fast-food meals, the stress and exhaustion that leads to evenings in front of the TV, the lack of exercise in most daily activity patterns — undermine the best intentions to change. So creating a structured environment, ideally involving other people attempting the same changes, may be very useful. Enlisting the family may help, too.

If I can’t make the lifestyle changes, can’t I take a pill?

Maybe. If you don’t think you can make diet and exercise changes, taking metformin may be the choice for you — provided you don’t have liver or kidney disease or suffer from congestive heart failure. Therapy with Glucophage, the brand name for metformin, costs between $2 and $4 per day, but generic metformin is expected to hit the market in the fall, bringing prices way down.

Yes, participants in the study who took Glucophage lost a few pounds and reduced reduced their risk of diabetes significantly, although not nearly as much as the lifestyle group. But if you continue to live a sedentary life, take in more calories than you burn off, eat a high-fat diet with few fruits, vegetables and whole grains, experts believe that you won’t be as effective at lowering your risk of diabetes, heart disease, high blood pressure, arthritis, stroke and other equally entertaining conditions. It’s your choice. Really.

Tagged ,

Insulin-dependent diabetes

Question. Could you please discuss what new research is being done on insulin-dependent diabetes, the kind that usually affects children? I’m particularly interested in learning more about pancreas transplants. My 6-year-old daughter has just developed diabetes.

Answer. A lot is happening in the quest for better methods of treatment or prevention of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Also called Type I diabetes, IDDM used to be called juvenile diabetes because it usually struck children. Type I diabetes is usually more serious and difficult to treat than the more common Type II diabetes (also called adult-onset diabetes), which accounts for about 90 percent of diabetes cases.

A common misconception is that all people who take insulin for treatment have insulin-dependent diabetes. Not so. IDDM refers to diabetes that requires insulin to sustain life. However, many people with non-insulin-dependent diabetes use insulin, although they don’t require it to live.

Three tracks of research are looking for answers to the problem of juvenile diabetes: 1) an immunization against Type I diabetes, 2) drugs to hinder the development of Type I diabetes and 3) pancreas transplants.

Some research points to a viral infection as the cause. If a vaccine could be developed to prevent such an infection from triggering juvenile diabetes, then many cases might be prevented. Currently, scientists aren’t sure whether the virus theory is correct or whether one or several viruses might be a culprit.

Other evidence places the blame on problems in the immune system, making it go awry and attack the cells of the pancreas, the abdominal gland that makes insulin. Drugs that suppress the immune system have been used to curb the development of juvenile diabetes in its early stages. Cyclosporine-more commonly used to prevent people from rejecting organ transplants-appears the most promising.

There are two major drawbacks to cyclosporine therapy. One is its potentially toxic side effects, particularly kidney damage. Another is the fact that the drug only postpones the development of diabetes, without eliminating it entirely. Once the drug is stopped, the diabetes reappears. Scientists are now studying the use of cyclosporine with other drugs in an attempt to reduce side effects and improve its effectiveness.

A third approach is the pancreas transplant. This technique involves giving someone with diabetes the part of the pancreas that makes insulin-the islet cells. However, there are many technical problems, with fewer than one in three transplants being successful. Improvements in technology may make this a better choice in the future.

For further information about diabetes, including programs for children with the disorder, contact the Juvenile Diabetes Foundation, 7307 MacArthur Blvd., Bethesda, Md. 20816; 320-3343, or the Washington, D.C. area affiliate of the American Diabetes Association, 1819 H St. NW, Suite No. 1200, Washington, D.C. 20006; 331-8303.

Tagged

Diabetics and risk of heart attack

THE QUESTION Can diabetics reduce their risk of heart attack and stroke through intensive blood pressure and cholesterol treatment?

PAST STUDIES have shown that type 2 diabetes raises a person’s risk of dying from heart disease by two to three times.

THIS STUDY compared 160 people with type 2 diabetes who were randomly assigned to receive either conventional treatment for diabetes through a general practitioner or intensive treatment for eight years. The intensive treatment, which was supervised by dietitians, included lowering saturated fat intake, increasing physical activity, quitting smoking, taking drugs to lower blood pressure, cholesterol and glucose levels and using multivitamins and aspirin.

At the end of the study, those who received intensive therapy — a large majority of whom had managed to cut their blood pressure, cholesterol and glucose levels — had about half the risk of cardiac events as those who received conventional therapy.

WHO MAY BE AFFECTED BY THESE FINDINGS? People with type 2 diabetes.

CAVEATS The researchers had received funds from manufacturers of the drugs used in this study. Also, more than half the people in the conventional-therapy group were referred to diabetes specialists during the study.

BOTTOM LINE Many diabetics may be able to reduce their risk of heart disease through intensive, supervised therapy. They may wish to consult their physician about making lifestyle changes and taking drugs to control blood pressure, glucose and cholesterol.

FIND THIS STUDY Jan. 30 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine; abstract online at www.nejm.org.

Blood Sugar and Diabetes

Q: I enjoyed your August 8 article on controlling weight in diabetes. Could you discuss blood sugar levels and guidelines for controlling them in Type II diabetes? One of the tests my doctor orders is a hemoglobin A-1c. What does this test tell?

A: About 90 percent of people with diabetes have Type II, also known as non-insulin dependent diabetes. Unlike those with Type I diabetes, people with Type II don’t require insulin in order to survive. For treatment, people with Type II may rely on diet and exercise alone, or use pills and insulin injections, or both.

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) has set guidelines for controlling your blood sugar, also called blood glucose. The fasting blood glucose is your level in the morning before eating or drinking anything. For this test, you should not have consumed anything after midnight. Your doctor checks your fasting glucose to see how good your control is overnight. Measuring your glucose around bedtime is important to help you avoid any episodes of dangerously low blood sugar levels while you’re asleep.

The glycated hemoglobin, also called glycosylated hemoglobin or hemoglobin A-1c, is a rough measure of your average blood sugar level during the past two to three months. Hemoglobin is the molecule in your blood cells that carries oxygen to tissues. In the presence of high levels of glucose, one type of hemoglobin, known as A-1c, irreversibly binds with glucose. This process is called glycation. The higher your blood glucose levels, the more glycated hemoglobin you have.

Your doctor can use this test to get a good idea of how well your blood glucose has been over time. Measuring your glycated hemoglobin can be especially helpful if you don’t check your blood glucose regularly. In some cases, an occasional blood glucose test may be quite high, but not be representative of your typical blood glucose. In those situations, a normal hemoglobin A-1c can reassure you that things aren’t as bad as you might have thought. On the other hand, a high hemoglobin A-1c should motivate you to do better at controlling your blood glucose.

You can also measure your blood sugar after eating, a test known as a post-prandial glucose. Doctors check this to see whether your body and your medicine can keep your blood sugar close to normal after a meal. In the table, the numbers in the left column are the upper limits of what’s considered normal. The numbers in the middle column are the targets for closely controlling your blood glucose. In the right column, action is suggested for numbers that are either too high (in which case you need more treatment) or too low (in which case you need to ease up on treatment). If your tests are consistently high, your doctor will probably change your treatment, either by increasing your medicine or adding a new medicine to your current one. In all cases, exercise, along with a low-fat, low-calorie, high-fiber diet will help improve your control. In fact, for many people with Type II diabetes, strict diet and exercise can keep your blood glucose under control without medication.

Recent research in people with Type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes suggests that carefully controlling your blood glucose lowers your risk of future complications, such as eye, kidney and nerve problems. For this reason, some doctors believe that “tight control” — keeping your blood sugar as close to normal as possible — is the best strategy for all types of diabetes. Other doctors are uncertain whether tight control is as crucial for people with Type II diabetes.

Another concern is that tight control comes at a certain cost, including a higher risk of low blood sugar reactions, and the inconvenience of the intensive monitoring and treatment. Also, it can be hard for some people to attain normal blood glucose levels even with good treatment.

Tight control and intensive monitoring aren’t for everyone, especially the elderly.

For more information, contact the local chapter of the American Diabetes Association, 1211 Connecticut Ave. NW, Suite 501, Washington, DC 20036 (telephone number: 202-331-8303) or the national office at 1660 Duke St., Alexandria, VA 22314 (phone: 800-232-3472 or 703-549-1500).

The ADA has just published the “American Diabetes Association Complete Guide to Diabetes”.

Tagged